On 2012-09-10T10:45:30, Alberto Menichetti <albmeniche...@tai.it> wrote:
> thank you for the quick response. > Maybe SPOF is not the best definition, but when the vcenter is > unavailable the safety of my data is not guaranteed. The safety remains guaranteed; the availability of your service wouldn't be ;-) > >>The fecing device I'd like to use is sdb. > >If you have a working SBD setup, you do not need the external/vcenter > >plugin any more. > What about using 2 different fencing mechanisms? But why? It doesn't provide any benefit. > Do you think it could introduce some problems in the cluster or is > it a suggested/supported solution? > I'd like to use external/vcenter as first choice and rely on sdb > only if the first stonith mechanism fails (for example, because of > the vcenter unavailability). Why? Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org