On 2012-10-02T19:28:28, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > > What are the implications of running Pacemaker with dynamic IP nodes? The IP > > would change on restart and all configuration would be wrong. Can it be done > > at all? > Nope. Not because of pacemaker, but the underlying messaging layer > (heartbeat/corosync) wouldn't be able to find its peer when it comes > back up.
As long as it's corosync with multicast (and the nodes still being able to communicate on the mcastaddr), it ought to be possible there. Mind, it isn't necessarily a great idea, but it should work. I'm not sure if statically assigned nodeids are going to be more reliable or not though. Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org