On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Arnold Krille <arn...@arnoldarts.de> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:21:24 -0400 Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> wrote: >> On 10/17/2012 02:10 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > A simple question for a simple 2-nodes cluster running >> > pacemaker-1.0.9, corosync-1.2.1 (Debian/Squeeze): >> > >> > will the online node stonith the other standby node if I stop the >> > cluster services on it? (I need to open the chassis) >> > >> > thanks! >> > jf >> >> No. >> >> The idea behind fencing is to restore a node to a known state. If you >> gracefully shutdown the cluster stack, then it is able to inform the >> peer node that it is leaving and will not be offering any clustered >> services. Thus, it is in a known state and all is fine. > > If my understanding is correct, the same applies when you "only" put > the node in standby? > At least I couldn't manually fence the node long after I did put it to > standby...
That doesn't sound right. How did you try and fence it? > > Have fun, > > Arnold > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org