On 2012-11-08T11:54:04, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > Downside, that I have just realized - resources which depend on this
> > one, and might want to depend on a service the container provides.
> >
> > (This could be an argument to go back to the "configure them as
> > primitives that are managed-by-proxy via the container resource", sigh.)
>
> Not necessarily if this is handled by the RA (as in Xen or
> VirtualDomain). And it should really be so. Even if we provide a
> solution just for Linux guests that should cover most
> installations. I guess that other OS (won't name them here) would
> come along eventually.
Uh? How should this be handled by the RA? Can you elaborate?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
