Hi, On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:50:59PM +1300, David Morton wrote: > Afternoon, > > We're replacing a production cluster (2 node) with a new > completely separate 2 node cluster later this week. I've removed one node > already to make way (physically) for the new machines, so everything is > working just fine as it is with a one node cluster only. The issue is that > the monitor operation for stonith resource keeps failing for the removed > node (IPMI stonith based on IBM IMM) as its no longer present, its not a > prerequisite resource so no resources have been affected. > > Is it safe to stop the resource given its the only / remaining stonith > resource in the cluster ? There is obviously nothing to stonith anymore > anyway but i don't like the idea of a monitor failing for another 4 days. > If its safest to just let the monitor fail essentially for ever then thats > fine too, rather not touch anything until the cluster is decommissioned. > > Relevant config options: > no-quorum-policy="ignore" > stonith-enabled="true"
If you have only one node left, then you definitely won't need stonith. You can just do property stonith-enabled=false and stop the stonith resource (resource stop mystonithrsc). Thanks, Dejan > Hope what I am asking is clear ... > > Dave > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
