On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: > 04.01.2013 13:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> >> wrote: >>> 04.01.2013 06:07, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>>> <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to share my successful attempt to confine pacemaker. >>>>> >>>>> I took pacemaker module barebone found in latest fedora's selinux-policy >>>>> (3.11.1-64.fc18) and >>>>> extended it a bit, so now I have pacemaker and some pacemaker-managed >>>>> services >>>>> running confined. >>>> >>>> Sweet. I've passed your amendments on to Milos who is looking after >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801493 >>> >>> I've extended it a bit more to run stonithd in fenced_t domain, so now >>> everything I can imagine runs fine (verified on two clusters, including >>> one with libvirt/qemu virtualization). >> >> Nice work :) >> >>> Where is the best place to follow up with that? >> >> Probably the redhat bug. > > I'm afraid no. > > It was just closed, and, looking at the errata package, I do not see any > way to run any confined service with that. > > I saw your question about possibility to run resources there in a > bug-report, but unfortunately I'm not allowed to see replies. Is it > answered at all?
grumble. /me goes off to kick somebody _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org