Lars wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > no matter which of the two i choose ? > > The question is - choose for what? Depending on what you want to do, > there is no alternative. > > Basically, the only use case for OCFS2's internal DLM is if > you want to > use OCFS2 without Pacemaker/corosync/cman. For example on SLE HA, that > is not generally supported (only for use with RAC). > > Both GFS2 (always) and OCFS2 (when integrated with Pacemaker) require > fs/dlm. Same is true for cLVM2. > > If you want to use a DLM yourself, libdlm user-space also requires > fs/dlm. OCFS2's DLM is special-purpose for, well, OCFS2. > > I'm sure Oracle will continue to maintain OCFS2's DLM too, but there's > not so much choice as you think there is ;-) > >
Hi, ok. I understand. So i have to choose fs/dlm, because i use OCFS2 with pacemaker. And this is maintained ? Bernd Helmholtz Zentrum München Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH) Ingolstädter Landstr. 1 85764 Neuherberg www.helmholtz-muenchen.de Aufsichtsratsvorsitzende: MinDir´in Bärbel Brumme-Bothe Geschäftsführer: Prof. Dr. Günther Wess und Dr. Nikolaus Blum Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 6466 USt-IdNr: DE 129521671 _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
