On 3/2/13 8:22 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
Unless it annoys you, this is actually harmless.
Otherwise, params first is what I tend to use.
Regards,
Lars
We've seen instances where failure-timeout is set, but Pacemaker never
seems to clean up the failure. First thought was it didn't actually
utilize the meta failure-timeout parameter if it was in the wrong place.
Probably need to troubleshoot it further and try to reproduce the issue.
David
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
