On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:02 PM, James Guthrie <j...@open.ch> wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Thanks for looking into this. We have since decided not to perform a >> failover on the failure of one of the sub-* resources for operational >> reasons. As a result, I can't reliably test if this issue is actually fixed >> in the current HEAD. (Speaking of which, do you have a date set yet for >> 1.1.9?)
ASAP. I'm hoping in a couple of hours from now, otherwise tomorrow. >> >> On Mar 6, 2013, at 8:39 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >> >>> I'm still very confused about why you're using master/slave though. >> >> The reason I went with master-slave was that we want the init script started >> on the "master" host and stopped on the "slave". > > You get those semantics from a normal primitive resource. > >> With a master-slave I have a monitor operation on the slave ensuring that >> the resource will be stopped on the slave if it were to be started manually >> (something I can't be sure wouldn't happen). AFAIK this wouldn't be the case >> with a "standard" resource. > > I think 1.1.8 allowed for operations with role=Stopped which would do > this for the highly paranoid :-) > >> >> Regards, >> James >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
