Ohhhhh! You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group. If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with sequential=true). If you want group.colocated=false, then use an ordering set (with sequential=true).
Hope that helps :) On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:16 PM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for comments. > >> > Case 3) group resource_set sequential=false >> > * Start of vip-rep waits for start of vip-master and is published. >> > * I expected a result same as the first case. >> >> Me too. Have you got the relevant PE file? > > I attached the thing which just collected hb_report. > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > --- On Thu, 2013/3/7, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:27 PM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: >> > Hi Andrew, >> > >> > I tried "resource_set .... sequential" designation. >> > * http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/84578 >> > >> > I caused an error in start of the vip-master resource and confirmed >> > movement. >> > >> > (snip) >> > <group id="master-group"> >> > <primitive class="ocf" id="vip-master" provider="pacemaker" >> > type="Dummy2"> >> > <operations> >> > <op id="vip-master-start-0s" interval="0s" name="start" >> > on-fail="restart" timeout="60s"/> >> > <op id="vip-master-monitor-10s" interval="10s" name="monitor" >> > on-fail="restart" timeout="60s"/> >> > <op id="vip-master-stop-0s" interval="0s" name="stop" >> > on-fail="block" timeout="60s"/> >> > </operations> >> > </primitive> >> > <primitive class="ocf" id="vip-rep" provider="pacemaker" >> > type="Dummy"> >> > <operations> >> > <op id="vip-rep-start-0s" interval="0s" name="start" >> > on-fail="stop" timeout="60s"/> >> > <op id="vip-rep-monitor-10s" interval="10s" name="monitor" >> > on-fail="restart" timeout="60s"/> >> > <op id="vip-rep-stop-0s" interval="0s" name="stop" >> > on-fail="block" timeout="60s"/> >> > </operations> >> > </primitive> >> > </group> >> > (snip) >> > >> > By the ordered designation of the group resource, the difference that I >> > expected appeared.( Case 1 and Case 2) >> > However, by the "sequential" designation, the difference that I expected >> > did not appear.(Case 3 and Case 4) >> > >> > (snip) >> > <constraints> >> > <rsc_order id="test-order"> >> > <resource_set sequential="true" >> > id="test-order-resource_set"> ---> or "false" >> > <resource_ref id="vip-master"/> >> > <resource_ref id="vip-rep"/> >> > </resource_set> >> > </rsc_order> >> > </constraints> >> > (snip) >> > >> > >> > Case 1) group meta_attribute ordered=false >> > * Start of vip-rep is published without waiting for start of vip-master. >> > >> > [root@rh63-heartbeat2 ~]# grep "Initiating action" /var/log/ha-log >> > Mar 7 19:40:50 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 2: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat1 - no >> > waiting >> > Mar 7 19:40:50 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 3: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) - no waiting >> > Mar 7 19:41:24 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 4: monitor vip-master_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:41:24 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 7: monitor vip-master_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) >> > Mar 7 19:41:24 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 5: monitor vip-rep_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:41:24 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 8: monitor vip-rep_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat2 (local) >> > Mar 7 19:41:24 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 6: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) - no waiting >> > Mar 7 19:41:25 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 3: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat1 - no >> > waiting >> > Mar 7 19:41:25 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 5: start vip-master_start_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:41:25 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 7: start vip-rep_start_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:41:26 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 8: monitor vip-rep_monitor_10000 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:41:27 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 2: stop vip-master_stop_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:41:28 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18992]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 6: stop vip-rep_stop_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > >> > >> > Case 2) group meta_attribute ordered=true >> > * Start of vip-rep waits for start of vip-master and is published. >> > >> > [root@rh63-heartbeat2 ~]# grep "Initiating action" /var/log/ha-log >> > Mar 7 19:34:37 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 2: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat1 - no >> > waiting >> > Mar 7 19:34:37 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 3: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) - no waiting >> > Mar 7 19:35:42 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 4: monitor vip-master_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:35:42 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 7: monitor vip-master_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) >> > Mar 7 19:35:42 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 5: monitor vip-rep_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:35:42 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 8: monitor vip-rep_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat2 (local) >> > Mar 7 19:35:42 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 6: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) - no waiting >> > Mar 7 19:35:43 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 3: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat1 - no >> > waiting >> > Mar 7 19:35:43 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 5: start vip-master_start_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:35:45 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [18865]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 1: stop vip-master_stop_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > >> > >> > Case 3) group resource_set sequential=false >> > * Start of vip-rep waits for start of vip-master and is published. >> > * I expected a result same as the first case. >> >> Me too. Have you got the relevant PE file? >> >> > >> > [root@rh63-heartbeat2 ~]# grep "Initiating action" /var/log/ha-log >> > Mar 7 19:43:50 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 2: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat1 - no >> > waiting >> > Mar 7 19:43:50 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 3: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) - no waiting >> > Mar 7 19:44:03 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 8: monitor vip-master_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:44:03 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 11: monitor vip-master_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) >> > Mar 7 19:44:03 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 9: monitor vip-rep_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:44:03 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 12: monitor vip-rep_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat2 (local) >> > Mar 7 19:44:04 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 10: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) - no waiting >> > Mar 7 19:44:05 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 7: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat1 - no >> > waiting >> > Mar 7 19:44:05 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 9: start vip-master_start_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:44:07 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19113]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 1: stop vip-master_stop_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > >> > >> > Case 4) group resource_set sequential=true >> > * Start of vip-rep waits for start of vip-master and is published. >> > >> > [root@rh63-heartbeat2 ~]# grep "Initiating action" /var/log/ha-log >> > Mar 7 19:48:25 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 2: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat1 - no >> > waiting >> > Mar 7 19:48:25 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 3: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) - no waiting >> > Mar 7 19:48:30 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 8: monitor vip-master_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:48:30 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 11: monitor vip-master_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) >> > Mar 7 19:48:30 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 9: monitor vip-rep_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:48:30 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 12: monitor vip-rep_monitor_0 on rh63-heartbeat2 (local) >> > Mar 7 19:48:30 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 10: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat2 >> > (local) - no waiting >> > Mar 7 19:48:31 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 7: probe_complete probe_complete on rh63-heartbeat1 - no >> > waiting >> > Mar 7 19:48:31 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 9: start vip-master_start_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > Mar 7 19:48:33 rh63-heartbeat2 crmd: [19239]: info: te_rsc_command: >> > Initiating action 1: stop vip-master_stop_0 on rh63-heartbeat1 >> > >> > >> > Does designation of my "resource_set" have a problem? >> > Or does not "resource_set" move well in Pacemaker1.0.13? >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > Hideo Yamauchi. >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> > >> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org