On 10/04/2013, at 8:51 AM, David Coulson <da...@davidcoulson.net> wrote:
> > On 4/7/13 10:29 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> Really really weird, I've got nothing :( > We've added SPANs on the switches for the two boxes in the cluster, so we can > hopefully at least identify that the ARP frame didn't come from them. Of > course, we've not had an occurrence of it in almost a month (even though we > have rebooted systems and manually migrated resources to rearrange it all), > so still in the dark. > > On a different, yet obviously related note, is there a document somewhere > that describes the specific Pacemaker configs which are supported in > RHEL6.3/6.4? We'll be moving these systems to 6.4 in the summer (once we > figure out how much you guys broke after 6.3 ;-) so curious how it will be > supported :) Pacemaker is not supported in 6.3 and all I am allowed to say at this point[1] is that your configuration isn't supportable for 6.4 Not because you've configured anything wrong/badly, but because a specific application is not present. However, if I can find a way to make any bug you find applicable to the supported use case, then there is a chance I can still get it fixed in a z-stream update. Since all resources look the same to Pacemaker, if you squint the right way, thats _almost_ like being supported for the general case. [1] Yes, this is highly annoying for me also. I have been pushing for a public announcement so I can end the double-speak. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
