Hi Andrew, > > To Andrew : > > If you make a patch removing a block of the file handling of pengine, I > > confirm the movement. > > If a problem is evaded without using tmpfs, many users welcome it. > > > > You mean this patch? https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/c7e10c6 > Or another one?
It is another one that I need. A necessary thing is the structure which I can evade without our using tmpfs. But it is our demand to the last because it is an environmental problem of vSphere5. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Fri, 2013/5/24, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > > On 24/05/2013, at 2:58 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > Hi Vladislav, > > > >> We test movement when we located pe file in tmpfs repeatedly. > >> It seems to move well for the moment. > > > > I only adopted tmpfs, and the I/O block of pengine was improved. > > I confirm the synchronization with the fixed file, but think that there is > > not the problem from now on. > > It becomes one means to solve this problem to adopt tmpfs. > > > >> Pacemaker really isn't designed to function without disk access. > >> You might be able to get away with it if you turn off saving PE files to > >> disk though. > > > > To Andrew : > > If you make a patch removing a block of the file handling of pengine, I > > confirm the movement. > > If a problem is evaded without using tmpfs, many users welcome it. > > > > You mean this patch? https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/c7e10c6 > Or another one? > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2013/5/22, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp > > <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > > > >> Hi Andrew, > >> Hi Vladislav, > >> > >> We test movement when we located pe file in tmpfs repeatedly. > >> It seems to move well for the moment. > >> > >> I confirm movement a little more, and we are going to try the method that > >> Mr. Vladislav synchronizes. > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Hideo Yamauchi. > >> > >> --- On Wed, 2013/5/22, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On 17/05/2013, at 4:17 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> P.S. Andrew, is this patch ok to apply? > >>> > >>> https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/c7e10c6 :) > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > >>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > >>> > >>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > >>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > >>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > >> > >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org