Hi Dejan, Thanks for the response.
In our setup, we want the resources to start on the 2 nodes (active/active) so that the downtime would be less. All clients connect to the VIP. If the resource on any one node goes down, I expect the VIP should be moved to another node and since the resource is already running on the another node the down time would be less. I thought of configuring them as is-manged= false then the pacemaker wouldn't restart the resources on failed node. Thanks Eswar On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm>wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:49:49PM +0530, ESWAR RAO wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am trying to run same RA on both nodes using clone. > > My set up is a 2 node cluster with HB+pacemaker. > > > > The RA aren't started automatically. > > They are started through pacemaker only. > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > #crm configure primitive ha_vip ocf:IPaddr2 params ip=192.168.101.205 > > cidr_netmask=32 nic=eth1 op monitor interval=30s > > > > #crm configure primitive oc_d1 lsb::testd1 meta allow-migrate="true" > > migration-threshold="1" failure-timeout="30s" op monitor interval="3s" > > #crm configure clone oc_d1_clone oc_d1 meta clone-max="2" > > clone-node-max="1" globally-unique="false" interleave="true" > > > > #crm configure primitive oc_d2 lsb::testd2 meta allow-migrate="true" > > migration-threshold="3" failure-timeout="30s" op monitor interval="5s" > > #crm configure clone oc_d2_clone oc_d2 meta clone-max="2" > > clone-node-max="1" globally-unique="false" interleave="true" > > > > # crm configure colocation oc-ha_vip inf: ha_vip oc_d1_clone oc_d2_clone > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > I observe the RAs are not getting started in the other node. > > > > ha_vip (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started ubuntu190 > > Clone Set: oc_d1_clone [oc_d1] > > Started: [ ubuntu190 ] > > Stopped: [ oc_d1:1 ] > > Clone Set: oc_d2_clone [oc_d2] > > Started: [ ubuntu190 ] > > Stopped: [ oc_d2:1 ] > > > > > > But if I remove the colocation constraint then the RA are starting on > the 2 > > nodes. > > But without colocation, if any RA fails the vip will not migrate which is > > bad. > > Can you explain why do you need the oc_* resources running both > nodes but at the same time they depend on the IP address which is > not cloned. Looks to me a condition which is simply impossible to > meet. > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > Can some one help me out in my issue. > > > > > > Thanks > > Eswar > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org >
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
