24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the > final release.
Is it going to be 1.1.10 or 1.2.0 (2.0.0)? > > So just a reminder, we're particularly looking for feedback in the following > areas: > > | plugin-based clusters, ACLs, the new –ban and –clear commands, and admin > actions > | (such as moving and stopping resources, calls to stonith_admin) which are > hard > | to test in an automated manner. > | > | Also any light that can be shed on possible memory leaks would be much > appreciated. > > I would very much like to hear the observations (good or bad) of people that > have taken it for a spin. > > -- Andrew > > [1] http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2013/release-candidate-1-dot-1-10-rc5/ > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
