On 07/01/2013 08:10 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On 01/07/2013, at 10:06 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: > >> 01.07.2013 14:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> >>> On 01/07/2013, at 9:45 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: >>> >>>> 01.07.2013 14:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>>> I'm yet to be convinced that having two PDUs is helping those people in >>>>>>> the first place. >>>>>>> If it were actually useful, I suspect more than two/three people would >>>>>>> have asked for it in the last decade. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm just silently waiting for this to happen. >>>>> >>>>> Rarely a good plan. >>>> >>>> ok, then here is my +1 :) >>>> >>>>> Better to make my life so miserable that implementing it seems like a >>>>> vacation in comparison :) >>>> >>>> :) >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Although I use different fencing scheme (and plan to use even more >>>>>> different one), that is very nice fall-back path for me. And I strongly >>>>>> prefer all complexities like reboot -> off-off-on-on to be hidden from >>>>>> the configuration. Naturally, that is task for the entity which has >>>>>> whole picture of what to do - stonithd. Just my 'IMHO'. >>>>> >>>>> If the tides of public opinion change, then yes, stonithd is the place. >>>> >>>> It would be natural. >>>> >>>>> But I can't justify the effort for only a handful of deployments. >>>> >>>> I do not use that only because I never used rgmanager, and that setup >>>> was not supported in pacemaker. If it was, I'd build my clusters in a >>>> different way, without need to reinvent a wheel. So, probably you may >>>> look from the other side - nobody uses unimplemented features but >>>> willing to use them once implemented. >>> >>> Yes, but people around here also tend to be quite vocal when they think >>> something is missing. >>> More so if its something critical. >> >> ok, that is not critical (for me), there are always ways to work around. >> F.e. I plan (and I already did all hardware modifications, the only >> remaining part is an agent) to sit on reset lines (like rcd_serial does) >> with quido device from papouch (www.papouch.com) as a second-level >> fencing mech in addition to ipmi. >> >> But, that would be nice to have feature if reboot command translation to >> multiple devices is implemented. And I would use it. > > Well its possible right now, it "just" not super pretty to configure. > You should be able to leave out the location constraints though, that reduces > the size a lot. > > And if people start using it, then we might look at simplifying it.
I didn't realize the location constraint was not needed. I'll test and update the wiki tomorrow to remove them. That would cut the configuration steps almost in half. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
