Hi Lars, that's why I wrote: The interested reader of that list does now know why I tried crm_simulate... :-)
Thank you Andreas Mock -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Lars Marowsky-Bree [mailto:l...@suse.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. September 2013 12:18 An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Solving a resource allocation problem On 2013-09-19T12:12:31, Andreas Mock <andreas.m...@web.de> wrote: > For a solution where I like to push a certain resource > to the new node (this service interruption doesn't > hurt too much) while being sure that the other gets > started on the newly upcoming node I have to balance > the stickiness and negative constraint scores. "negative" constraint scores are always absolute. You can set stickiness per resource. So for that that you want shifted, just set it to zero, and to non-zero for the others. Utilization can be used to perform the load balancing bit. Is that not working? > Therefore I would like to see the simulated scores. That's something you've got a separate thread going for. ;-) Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
