On 18/10/2013, at 10:12 PM, yusuke iida <yusk.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Andrew > > Now, I am testing the configuration of one standby node and active node of 15. > About 10 Dummy resources are started per node. > > If all the nodes are started with this composition, before all the > resources start, it will take the time for about 20 minutes. > > And some resources have caused start timeout. > probe is performed all at once by all the nodes at a start-up. > The result is written in cib and synchronizes with all the nodes. > This processing requires very high load. > I think that timeout has occurred owing to it. More than likely, yes. > > I am very interested in whether this problem is solvable, if you use > throttle created now. I have been using it, I have found it more effective than batch-limit for bounding CPU usage and avoiding timeouts. I would be interested to hear your feedback if you have the time to do some testing. > When is throttle due to be merged into the repository of ClusterLabs? It is queued up behind a compatibility patch that is needed for some changes I made to the pacemaker-remote wire protocol. > > Best Regards, > > -- > ---------------------------------------- > METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD > > Yusuke Iida > Mail: yusk.i...@gmail.com > ---------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
