Am Mittwoch, 27. November 2013, 10:51:43 schrieb Bauer, Stefan: > Thank you Michael for pointing that out. > > I now use colocation cluster inf: (p_openvpn1 p_openvpn2) cluster > > Now the openvpn resources can be stopped independently - but still depend on > ressources from the cluster-group. > > Is that the expected behavior? I'm a bit confused as I expected the other > way around. If the group is (after) openvpn in the list, it should depend > on openvpn. Like I would read from left to right.
Rewrite the constraint like: colocation col_cluster inf: cluster (p_openvpn1 p_openvpn2) colocation reads: colocate resource WITH another resource. But this is all documented in the manuals. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Michael Schwartzkopff -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64, +49 (162) 165 0044 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
