I have a resource which updates DNS records (Amazon's Route53). When it
performs it's `monitor` action, it can sometimes fail because of issues
with Amazon's API. So I want failures to be ignored for the monitor
action, and so I set `op monitor on-fail=ignore`. However now when the
monitor action comes back as 'stopped', pacemaker does nothing. In my
opinion a "stopped" return code should not be a failure condition, and
thus the `on-fail=ignore` should not apply. It basically makes the
monitor option completely useless. It won't do anything on failure, it
won't do anything on stopped, so you might as well not have a monitor
action at all.

If this is a bug I can create a bug report, just not sure if this is
deliberate or not.


Pacemaker 1.1.10 on Ubuntu 12.04


-Patrick
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to