Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2013, 11:27:51 schrieb Bauer, Stefan: > Hi Michael, > > so that means, either increasing one value or lower the other right? > Or is lowering resource_stickiness the only reasonable way? > > I tried a multiplier of 1000 but no change in the behavior. > > Stefan > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Michael Schwartzkopff [mailto:m...@sys4.de] > You resource_stickiness is too high in respect to the pingd points. You > resource "earns" 700 points staying there where it is and only 300 points > for moving. Reduce your resource_stickiness to a reasonable amount.
Test your config. check the points by # crm_simulate -s -L and adjust your scoring system accordingly. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Michael Schwartzkopff -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64, +49 (162) 165 0044 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
