Am Freitag, 13. Dezember 2013, 10:25:48 schrieb Lars Marowsky-Bree:
> On 2013-12-13T10:16:41, Kristoffer Grönlund <kgronl...@suse.com> wrote:
> > Lars (lmb) suggested that we might switch to using the { } - brackets
> > around resource sets everywhere for consistency. My only concern with
> > that would be that it would be a breaking change to the previous crmsh
> > syntax. Maybe that is okay when going from 1.x to 2.0, but it also
> > makes me a bit nervous. :)
>
> Yes, but consistency and syntax cleanups are important for 2.0.
>
> Also, then we may finally be able to change the order for collocation
> constraints as well ;-)Syntax changes: ok. sounds reasonable. Order for colocations and order constraints: Please don't do it. Everybody got use to the ordering as it is now. It also makes sense. Please remember the irritations we had moving from heartbeat 2.0 (with XML, shudder) to the new pacemaker/crm syntax and constraint orders. I don't want to have that again. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Michael Schwartzkopff -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64, +49 (162) 165 0044 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
