Le 16/12/2013 17:28, Brian J. Murrell a écrit :
So is there something I am misunderstanding or is this not actually working? The node I was trying this on is EL6.4.
Redundant ring protocol in CMAN works very fine with >=RHEL6.4 (I only use in active mode though).
Is it possible that lotus-5vm8 (from DNS) and lotus-5vm8-ring1 (from /etc/hosts) resolves to the same IP (10.128.0.206) which could maybe confuse cman and make it decide that there is only one ring ?
In my case, to be extra safe, and because I want everything to work without network in case of admin interventions/failures (whatever), I always put both entries in /etc/hosts, eg:
192.168.10.1 node01 node01.example.com 192.168.150.1 node01_alt node01_alt.example.com -- Cheers, Florian Crouzat _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
