Hi, This is a follow up on my previous post 'Trouble building Pacemaker from source on CentOS 5.10' Andrew: Thanks for your pointers.
It turns out Pacemaker 1.1.10 needed more changes to build on CentOS 5.x. * revert of a81d222 * g_timeout_add_seconds not available in libc in lib/services/services_linux.c * qb_to_cs_error conflicting type definition in include/crm_internal.h * Configure with --disable-fatal-warnings This brings to my question: Pacemaker 1.1.10 was already broken for this OS, and I'm assuming that 1.1.11 will diverge even further. What is the official position in regard to RHEL/CENTOS 5.x support & testing ? Are there any other person that can not afford yet to move to RHEL 6 (for whatever reason) and are interested in keeping RHEL/CENTOS 5.x compatibility ? Thanks, -Stephane
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
