On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:41:20 +0300 Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote:
> I would expect that only one option is modified, but crmsh intend to > remove all others. > > May be it is possible to fix it by one-line crmsh patch? > > Kristoffer, Dejan? Hi, Yes, the intended behavior is for crmsh to preserve the unrelated properties when performing an update, so this does look like a bug in crmsh. It would be helpful if you could show me the property line in the configuration before applying the update, thank you. -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // kgronl...@suse.com _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
