On 14 Jan 2014, at 3:41 pm, Brian J. Murrell (brian) <br...@interlinx.bc.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 08:09 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> The local cib hasn't caught up yet by the looks of it. > > Should crm_resource actually be [mis-]reporting as if it were > knowledgeable when it's not though? IOW is this expected behaviour or > should it be considered a bug? Should I open a ticket? It doesn't know that it doesn't know. Does it show anything as running? Any nodes as online? I'd not expect that it stays in that situation for more than a second or two... > >> You could compare 'cibadmin -Ql' with 'cibadmin -Q' > > Is there no other way to force crm_resource to be truthful/accurate or > silent if it cannot be truthful/accurate? Having to run this kind of > pre-check before every crm_resource --locate seems like it's going to > drive overhead up quite a bit. True. > > Maybe I am using the wrong tool for the job. Is there a better tool > than crm_resource to ascertain, with full truthfullness (or silence if > truthfullness is not possible), where resources are running? We could add an option to force crm_resource to use the master instance instead of the local one I guess.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
