if i run any crm command e.g crm resource move whatever 2node corosync.log show every second a [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: ......
tcpdump ength 1451: (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 1437) 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 226.94.1.1.netsupport: [bad udp cksum e04a!] UDP, length 1409 08:51:28.582152 52:54:00:09:ef:2f > 01:00:5e:5e:01:01, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1451: (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 1437) 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 226.94.1.1.netsupport: [bad udp cksum f4ee!] UDP, length 1409 08:51:28.582217 52:54:00:09:ef:2f > 01:00:5e:5e:01:01, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1451: (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 1437) 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 226.94.1.1.netsupport: [bad udp cksum cc45!] UDP, length 1409 08:51:28.582278 52:54:00:09:ef:2f > 01:00:5e:5e:01:01, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1451: (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 1437) 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 226.94.1.1.netsupport: [bad udp cksum 3df9!] UDP, length 1409 08:51:28.582349 52:54:00:09:ef:2f > 01:00:5e:5e:01:01, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1451: (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 1437) 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 226.94.1.1.netsupport: [bad udp cksum 771!] UDP, length 1409 08:51:28.582406 52:54:00:09:ef:2f > 01:00:5e:5e:01:01, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1451: (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 1437) 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 226.94.1.1.netsupport: [bad udp cksum 7f89!] UDP, length 1409 08:51:28.582475 52:54:00:09:ef:2f > 01:00:5e:5e:01:01, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1451: (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 1437) 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 226.94.1.1.netsupport: [bad udp cksum 9865!] UDP, length 1409 08:51:28.582526 52:54:00:09:ef:2f > 01:00:5e:5e:01:01, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1264: (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 1250) 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 226.94.1.1.netsupport: [bad udp cksum c8ca!] UDP, length 1222 2014-02-14 8:48 GMT+01:00 Beo Banks <beo.ba...@googlemail.com>: > hi > > > [bad udp cksum fa38!] > > is that a normal? > > > node 1 > > tcpdump -envv "port 5405" -i eth1 > tcpdump: listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size > 65535 bytes > 08:46:01.230420 52:54:00:09:ef:2f > 52:54:00:ba:8a:1c, ethertype IPv4 > (0x0800), length 149: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto > UDP (17), length 135) > 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 10.0.0.22.netsupport: [bad udp cksum fa38!] > UDP, length 107 > 08:46:01.440315 52:54:00:09:ef:2f > 01:00:5e:5e:01:01, ethertype IPv4 > (0x0800), length 161: (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto > UDP (17), length 147) > 10.0.0.21.hpoms-dps-lstn > 226.94.1.1.netsupport: [bad udp cksum > 7339!] UDP, length 119 > 08:46:02.015321 52:54:00:ba:8a:1c > 52:54:00:09:ef:2f, ethertype IPv4 > (0x0800), length 149: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto > UDP (17), length 135) > 10.0.0.22.hpoms-dps-lstn > 10.0.0.21.netsupport: [udp sum ok] UDP, > length 10 > > > 2014-02-13 19:37 GMT+01:00 Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca>: > > On 13/02/14 12:01 PM, Beo Banks wrote: >> >>> hi thanks...for your help. >>> i have two node cluster >>> both node are running on seperate hosts. >>> the 2x hosts have 2 nic's ....eth0 is 172.XXX...whatever and eth1 is >>> direct connection (crossover cable) between the hosts. >>> the issue must be my kvm host,or? >>> >> >> What kind of bridging are you using? Standard NAT'ed virbr0 bridges? If >> so, can you/have you tried using traditional bridging? That should turn the >> bridge into more of a traditional switch instead of relying on packet >> routing... I've had no trouble with VM clusters, but I only ever tested >> with both VMs on the same host. >> >> Here's how I build my bridges: >> >> https://alteeve.ca/w/AN!Cluster_Tutorial_2#Configuring_our_Bridge.2C_ >> Bonds_and_Interfaces >> >> Of course, you could create a stand-alone bridge and use brctl to attach >> the real interface instead of modifying the network config, if you just >> want to test. Once the bridge is built, simple adjust the VM's config to >> use the new bridge. If that works well, then you could consider a more >> permanent config. >> >> -- >> Digimer >> Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ >> What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without >> access to education? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org