Hello, I am dealing with a three-node multi-site cluster using pacemaker and corosync. The third node is a quorum-only node.
The three nodes form a single cluster and are connected using corosync over the internet (using VPN tunnels). Of cource, using corosync over the internet and using a third node with the full corosync/pacemaker stack installed doesn't seem to be the ideal solution. So I took a look at the booth daemon, which, at first glance, seems like a better alternative. Unfortunately, because I would have to split my single cluster into two local ones, I don't see a way to still use location constraints for my resources. For my use case it is important to always migrate the master resource based on a calculated score. This works great with single clusters. Am I missing something or is this indeed a disadvantage when using booth? Best regards, Christian
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
