Hi Andrew,

> > I'd expect that block to hit this clause though:
> > 
> >      } else if(mainloop_timer_running(a->timer)) {
> >         crm_info("Write out of '%s' delayed: timer is running", a->id);
> >         return;
> 
> Which point of the source code does the suggested code mentioned above revise?
> (Which line of the source code is it?)

Is it the next cord that you pointed?

void
write_attribute(attribute_t *a)
{
    int updates = 0;
(snip)
    } else if(mainloop_timer_running(a->timer)) {
        crm_info("Write out of '%s' delayed: timer is running", a->id);
        return;
    }
(snip)

At the time of phenomenon of the problem, the timer does not yet block it by 
this processing because it does not start.

Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.

--- On Wed, 2014/5/28, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> 
wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Thank you for comment.
> 
> > > --- attrd/command.c -----
> > > (snip)
> > >    /* this only involves cluster nodes. */
> > >    if(v->nodeid == 0 && (v->is_remote == FALSE)) {
> > >        if(crm_element_value_int(xml, F_ATTRD_HOST_ID, (int*)&v->nodeid) 
> > >== 0) {
> > >            /* Create the name/id association */
> > >            crm_node_t *peer = crm_get_peer(v->nodeid, host);
> > >            crm_trace("We know %s's node id now: %s", peer->uname, 
> > >peer->uuid);
> > >            if(election_state(writer) == election_won) {
> > >                write_attributes(FALSE, TRUE);
> > >                return;
> > >            }
> > >        }
> > >    }
> > 
> > This is for 5194 right?
> 
> No.
> I listed the same thing in 5194, but this does not seem to be 5194 basic 
> problems.
> 
> I try the reproduction of 5194 problems, but have not been able to yet 
> reappear.
> Possibly 5194 problems may not happen in PM1.1.12-rc1.
>  * As for 5194 matters, please give me time a little more.
> 
> > 
> > I'd expect that block to hit this clause though:
> > 
> >      } else if(mainloop_timer_running(a->timer)) {
> >         crm_info("Write out of '%s' delayed: timer is running", a->id);
> >         return;
> 
> Which point of the source code does the suggested code mentioned above revise?
> (Which line of the source code is it?)
> 
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
> 
> --- On Wed, 2014/5/28, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On 27 May 2014, at 12:13 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > The attrd_updater command ignores the "dampen" parameter and updates an 
> > > attribute.
> > > 
> > > Step1) Start one node.
> > > [root@srv01 ~]# crm_mon -1 -Af
> > > Last updated: Tue May 27 19:36:35 2014
> > > Last change: Tue May 27 19:34:59 2014
> > > Stack: corosync
> > > Current DC: srv01 (3232238180) - partition WITHOUT quorum
> > > Version: 1.1.11-f0f09b8
> > > 1 Nodes configured
> > > 0 Resources configured
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Online: [ srv01 ]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Node Attributes:
> > > * Node srv01:
> > > 
> > > Migration summary:
> > > * Node srv01: 
> > > 
> > > Step2) Update an attribute by attrd_updater command.
> > > [root@srv01 ~]# attrd_updater -n default_ping_set -U 500 -d 3000       
> > > 
> > > Step3) The attribute is updated without waiting for the time of the 
> > > "dampen" parameter.
> > > [root@srv01 ~]# cibadmin -Q | grep ping_set            
> > >          <nvpair id="status-3232238180-default_ping_set" 
> > >name="default_ping_set" value="500"/>
> > > 
> > > The next code seems to have a problem somehow or other.
> > > 
> > > --- attrd/command.c -----
> > > (snip)
> > >    /* this only involves cluster nodes. */
> > >    if(v->nodeid == 0 && (v->is_remote == FALSE)) {
> > >        if(crm_element_value_int(xml, F_ATTRD_HOST_ID, (int*)&v->nodeid) 
> > >== 0) {
> > >            /* Create the name/id association */
> > >            crm_node_t *peer = crm_get_peer(v->nodeid, host);
> > >            crm_trace("We know %s's node id now: %s", peer->uname, 
> > >peer->uuid);
> > >            if(election_state(writer) == election_won) {
> > >                write_attributes(FALSE, TRUE);
> > >                return;
> > >            }
> > >        }
> > >    }
> > 
> > This is for 5194 right?
> > 
> > I'd expect that block to hit this clause though:
> > 
> >      } else if(mainloop_timer_running(a->timer)) {
> >         crm_info("Write out of '%s' delayed: timer is running", a->id);
> >         return;
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> 

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to