21.10.2014 05:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On 20 Oct 2014, at 8:52 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Andrew, David, all, >> >> It seems like #kind was introduced before bare-metal remote node >> support, and now it is matched against "cluster" and "container". >> Bare-metal remote nodes match "container" (they are remote), but >> strictly speaking they are not containers. >> Could/should that attribute be extended to the bare-metal use case? > > Unclear, the intent was 'nodes that aren't really cluster nodes'. > Whats the usecase for wanting to tell them apart? (I can think of some, just > want to hear yours)
I want VM resources to be placed only on bare-metal remote nodes. -inf: #kind ne container looks a little bit strange. #kind ne remote would be more descriptive (having now them listed in CIB with 'remote' type). > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org