Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553857 --- Comment #2 from Tomas Mraz <tm...@redhat.com> 2010-01-12 02:40:30 EST --- Is having separate configuration for pam_ldap and nss_ldap really a good idea? It creates unnecessary hassle for the sysadmins and in 99% of configurations involving both of these packages the contents of the configuration files will be the same. I suggest adding a subpackage (either to pam_ldap or nss_ldap - choose package which you think will be used in more cases) named for example ldap-config which would contain just the ldap.conf and ldap.secret files. The nss_ldap and pam_ldap packages can then require this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
