Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856 --- Comment #14 from Eric Smith <e...@brouhaha.com> 2010-01-31 21:03:23 EST --- Upstream states that nlist.h is a problem in Debian as well, and actually recommends not including the header in the RPM. Removing the function from the library is not recommended as doing so would change the ABI, so upstream will remove it at the next SOVERSION bump. At this point since I've already moved the header out of harm's way per Ralf's request, I'm inclined to leave it in the RPM until it is removed upstream. It is also mentioned that nlist does not have a link order issue since libbsd and elfutils-libelf are both versioned. For more detail, see this message on the libbsd mailing list: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libbsd/2010-January/000033.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
