Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565858 Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-02-16 10:56:24 EST --- Some quick notes - build fails, at least BR: ruby-devel is needed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1990997 - C extension modules should be installed under %ruby_sitearch, not under %geminstdir https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_packages_with_binary_content.2Fshared_libraries - To create debuginfo rpms correctly, you once have to install gem file under %_builddir (i.e. you cannot install this gem file under %buildroot directory, otherwise creating debuginfo rpm fails: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gem_with_extension_libraries_written_in_C - As this gem contains spec/ directory, please add %check section and execute some test program (like $ rake spec ) there. - Please use defined %geminstdir macro in %files - "CHANGELOG" "COPYING" "README" (and usually also "Rakefile") should correctly marked as %doc. Also benchmark/ example/ spec/ tasks/ directories can perhaps be marked as %doc. - ext/ directory are to compile C extention module (thin_parser.so) and need not be packaged into binary rpm. - It seems that license tag should be "MIT and BSD and (Ruby or GPLv2)", however I will recheck this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
