Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-02-19 00:02:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > (In reply to comment #15) > > > - See my comment 9 > > > > > > > I don't see how rake test in rubygem-ruby-debug can succeed, when executed > > from > > the %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir}, without the ext/ > > directory > > from rubygem-ruby-debug-base in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/ruby-debug-0.10.3/ > > > > This should have said: > > I don't see how rake test in rubygem-ruby-debug can succeed, when executed > from > the %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir}, without the ext/ directory > from rubygem-ruby-debug-base in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/ruby-debug-0.10.3/ or > %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir} - So please see my comment 9. Already patch attached. (In reply to comment #16) > > > 2) I see no use for two separate packages > > - It makes maintenanse much easier. > > Actually it doesn't, as we have seen with the rails packages as well. - No. It is just on Fedora chain-build cannot be used for rails related packages other than rawhide branch. It is just Fedora's builder issue. Seperating srpm is always preferable, for example when security issue is found on actionpack, we just apply a patch against actionpack only and only release new actionpack. Recompiling rails releated packages all is just silly in such case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
