Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #52 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior <henrique...@gmail.com> 2010-02-22 07:03:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #51) > Are you going to have a separate jogl-javadoc package, by the way, or will > that > come as part of the jogl package? I'm going to build a separated javadock package. We already have this functional gluegen package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627#c35 but the main problem with JOGL is that it needs a side by side copy of gluegen to build his build.xml. The doubt here is if we can use this bundled gluegen in this initial step and discard it. This bundled gluegen and our packaged gluegen will be the same. Use the bundled gluegen only means that the package can be done without major hacking in JOGL (which, incidentally, are out of my ability). Maybe it becames clearer if I post here one draft. I'm working on it. =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
