Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557917 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen <[email protected]> 2010-02-23 21:47:56 EST --- checklist: package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: see above for my overall spec file comments license: ok license field: ok license file: none in the tarball, might want to talk upstream into shipping it spec file language: ok readability: ok upstream sources: ok, but there's a newer release buildable: see above, doesn't build in mock ExcludeArch: none, ok BuildRequires: ok locale handling: ok ldconfig: ok system libraries: ok relocatable: no, ok directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok content: permissible large docs: ok %doc content: ok headers: ok static libs: ok pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel deps: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: ok directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
