Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567542 --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl <cw...@alumni.drew.edu> 2010-03-15 12:49:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I solved it by 'Provides: cpanminus'. Some reviewers won't accept "useles" > sub-package. I'm personally not sure about this split either. And that should work fine when installing at a yum commandline, but can you place a bit of rpm metadata in comps? My thinking is that it's not "useless" for a couple reasons: comps, recognition, and a pattern of history where this has been done (everything from perltidy which packages Perl::Tidy but is named "perltidy" to the more recent main/sub splits). If you were packaging a binary program called, say, baz, you wouldn't call it libbaz, would you? Anyways. This is probably better discussed outside of bugzilla :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
