https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #3 from Mattia Meneguzzo <mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> All the four subpackages own the folder %{_datadir}/themes/%{short_name}/
> and contain the same doc files. Currently, there's no base package named
> egtk. I recommend to add a package named egtk-common and let it own the
> aforementioned folder and the doc files.
> %setup -q -c -n %{name}-%{version}
>
> You may drop "-n %{name}-%{version}" in %setup. Unless you need a different
> name for the build folder, you don't need to add this pattern explicitely.
OK, I'll follow your suggestions.
> Moreover, it is not needed to correct a wrong FSF address. Give the
> developers an appropriate hint and leave the file untouched for the time
> being.
I've already filed a bug report to the eGTK developers about the FSF address
issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/egtk/+bug/1005780
I'll remove the line that corrects it from the Spec file.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
