https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> --- Just a brief look: * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming As a precedent, Debian and openSUSE called it libnettle. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines | MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms | the build produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1] That doesn't imply it's only the reviewer who must do this. rpmlint is also a tool for packagers. > Version: 2.5 > Release: 0.1pre%{?dist} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages A little bit pedantic, but Fedora adds another dot after the X.Y number: Release: 0.1.pre%{?dist} > License: LGPLv2.1+ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses > %package tools > Group: System Environment/Libraries As tools are not libraries, the package could fit into groups "System Environment/Base" or "Development/Tools". The package description doesn't expand on what these utility programs do, however. > %package devel > Summary: Development files for libnettle > License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2.1+ This will require a closer look. Why does the licensing here differ from the base library packages? > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > Requires: libhogweed = %{version}-%{release} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package > %preun -p /sbin/ldconfig > > %preun -n libhogweed -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun would be the correct place to execute this. > %files tools > %doc COPYING.LIB https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing > testsuite Please investigate whether this is suitable for running "make check" in the %check section of the spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
