https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
--- Comment #11 from John Morris <j...@zultron.com> --- Created attachment 594636 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=594636&action=edit Email from author: suggestions for packaging Hi fellas, I'm attaching an email from the author. In summary, he discourages us from packaging PyCXX separately, and especially discourages my idea to pre-compile into arch-specific static libs. He points out pycvs, a precedent for bundling PyCXX. I tracked down the original Fedora review request where this same issue was discussed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718#c12 Packaging binaries is out of the question. If anyone has strong feelings about not packaging this separately, I'm ok with abandoning this. Otherwise, I'll proceed with the current RPM. I'll probably add a pkgconfig .pc file as Alec suggested here to make life easy for any other project maintainers who need this: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2300#c20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
