https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819687

Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |ti...@math.uh.edu
           Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org    |ti...@math.uh.edu
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> ---
I'll assume that because you don't clean the buildroot in %install that you
don't intend to submit this for EL5.  Given that, here's a review:

The first line of the spec is pointless regardless of what releases you intend
to package for.

The python_sitelib define at the top is unnecessary; all Fedora and EL6 already
have this.

BuildRoot: is unnecessary, as is the %clean section.

The Summary: and %description are rather deficient; neither really tells me
much about the package.  Unfortunately these appear to come from upstream. 
I'll suggest these:

Summary: A python interface to the Request Tracker API

%description
A Python module providing access to the Best Practical Request Tracker (RT)
REST interface.

Not the best, I guess, but better than what's there.

The package is out of date; the current version appears to be 0.2.4.  I'll go
ahead and take this for review, but you should update to the current version
before I get any further into it.  Unless, of course, you have a reason for not
updating to the current version.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to