https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840253
--- Comment #4 from Lukáš Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> --- Matt, thanks for your report. Now this is fixed - rawhide (maybe F17 too) use different builder tool (waf) which slightly changed some options for vala. I fixed this. Please note version was changed upstream - I bumped version number thus. http://lzap.fedorapeople.org/fedora-packaging/fourterm/1.0.5/fourterm.spec http://lzap.fedorapeople.org/fedora-packaging/fourterm/1.0.5/fourterm-1.0.5-1.fc16.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4242234 $ rpmlint *rpm fourterm-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package fourterm.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{_tmppath} fourterm.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{name} fourterm.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{version} fourterm.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{release} fourterm.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{__id_u} fourterm.src:43: W: macro-in-comment %{__rm} fourterm.src:71: W: macro-in-comment %{__rm} fourterm.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency glib2 fourterm.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgee fourterm.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fourterm fourterm.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs /usr/share/doc/fourterm-1.0.4/INSTALL 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 9 warnings. I guess libgee and glib2 should be removed (?) from "Requires" section? I can write the man page if needed, not sure if this is needed for program that does no support any option. I can remove the install file. I don't know if the empty debuginfo is an issue. Thanks for help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
