https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803558
Matt Spaulding <mspauldin...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Matt Spaulding <mspauldin...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> hi
> > 3. Ask upstream to include a LICENSE file. Some of the test source files do
> > not have license headers. You might mention that to them as well.
> is available in src/assemble/EHCACHE-CORE-LICENSE.txt
> http://ehcache.org/about/license
Thanks for catching my mistake here. Didn't see that file.
>
> > 5. There is a newer version available (2.5.2). Not required; but if the
> > change is trivial, you should update to the latest version.
> there is a new version available
> http://svn.terracotta.org/svn/ehcache/tags/ehcache-core-2.6.0
> the source rpm is available here http://gil.fedorapeople.org/
Looked at your new 2.6.0 package. Everything looks good and all issues are
corrected.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
