https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844164
--- Comment #15 from Matthias Runge <mru...@matthias-runge.de> ---
I guess, this licensing thing will be ok. It's just the header file which is
apparently copied from OpenBSD and BSD licensed only.
Another issue:
[!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if
present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in non-devel package (fix or explain):mate-
vfs-smb-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-
vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64
/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libbzip2.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm :
/usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libcomputer.so mate-
vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libdns-
sd.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-
vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64
/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libftp.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm :
/usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libgzip.so mate-
vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so
mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-
vfs-2.0/modules/libnetwork.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm :
/usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libnntp.so mate-
vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libsftp.so
mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-
vfs-2.0/modules/libtar.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64
/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libvfs-test.so
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
