https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787510

Martin Preisler <mprei...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #12 from Martin Preisler <mprei...@redhat.com> ---
Although upstream puts binary dlls and one exe into the zip archive they are
not installed so I think it's not an issue except it bloats the lookaside
cache.

I think that including the two zero length files is OK, I would suggest that
upstream puts a comment in there saying that they are "// empty for now" or
something to avoid any future confusion.

Regarding
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' 
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name CMakeLists.txt -exec rm -f {} ';'
The first should be an option in the cmake file, the second is clearly a
mistake and upstream should be notified.

Nice to haves but unimportant:
[!]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[!]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass
(EDIT: The latter is actually correct and I just missed it in the .spec file,
sorry!)

MD5-sum check
-------------
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ogl-math/glm-0.9.3.2/glm-0.9.3.2.zip :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
ee66ab8336b9b6b3dff69268c497688268cf5a9d2b3a14e1aa6fbd7f48c911be
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
ee66ab8336b9b6b3dff69268c497688268cf5a9d2b3a14e1aa6fbd7f48c911be

Approved, full review here: http://pastebin.com/yR4Sjz9Z

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to