https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852892
Jaroslav Škarvada <jskar...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskar...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Thanks for the review.
> [!]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
> Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached
> diff).
>
> I suppose the specfile outside the SRPM is more recent. Please, confirm.
>
Correct, I just forget to refresh the SRPM :), fixed without version bump.
> [!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>
> spec file states GPL+, included COPYING file is GPLv2
>
I guess it is OK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F
But I will ask upstream to clarify their intention.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
