https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864066
Mario Blättermann <mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
| |m
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
| |m
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com> ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4588995
$ rpmlint -i -v *
libecb.noarch: I: checking
libecb.noarch: E: devel-dependency glibc-headers
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
libecb.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US popcount -> pop count,
pop-count, upcountry
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libecb.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US prefetch -> pref etch,
pref-etch, prefect
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libecb.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US noinline -> no inline,
no-inline, nonlinear
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libecb.noarch: I: checking-url http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/libecb (timeout
10 seconds)
libecb.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ecb.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
libecb.src: I: checking
libecb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US popcount -> pop count,
pop-count, upcountry
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libecb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US prefetch -> pref etch,
pref-etch, prefect
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libecb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US noinline -> no inline,
no-inline, nonlinear
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libecb.src: I: checking-url http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/libecb (timeout 10
seconds)
libecb.src: W: no-%build-section
The spec file does not contain a %build section. Even if some packages don't
directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to
provide additional "under the hood" functionality, such as injection of
automatic -debuginfo subpackages. Add the section, even if empty.
libecb.src:12: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 2)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic
annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.
libecb.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libecb-20121008.tar.xz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
libecb.spec: W: no-%build-section
The spec file does not contain a %build section. Even if some packages don't
directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to
provide additional "under the hood" functionality, such as injection of
automatic -debuginfo subpackages. Add the section, even if empty.
libecb.spec:12: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 2)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic
annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.
libecb.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libecb-20121008.tar.xz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 13 warnings.
Some warnings are ignorable. The invalid source is nevertheless valid, because
we have a VCS checkout. It *is* a devel package although it doesn't have the
-devel suffix, because there are no other files.
You just have to fix the missing %build section and the mixed use of spaces and
tabs. I recommend spaces, because this way we get the same view in all text
editors, regardless of the configured tab width.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
