https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871204

Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rc040...@freenet.de

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> ---
The licensing claimed in the file LICENSE is does not match with the licenses
found inside of the sources:

# find -name '*.h' | xargs grep -i license
./urdf_world/include/urdf_world/world.h:* Software License Agreement (BSD
License)
./urdf_model/include/urdf_model/color.h:* Software License Agreement (BSD
License)
./urdf_model/include/urdf_model/twist.h:* Software License Agreement (BSD
License)
./urdf_model/include/urdf_model/link.h:* Software License Agreement (BSD
License)
./urdf_model/include/urdf_model/model.h:* Software License Agreement (BSD
License)
./urdf_model/include/urdf_model/joint.h:* Software License Agreement (BSD
License)
./urdf_model/include/urdf_model/pose.h:* Software License Agreement (BSD
License)
./urdf_sensor/include/urdf_sensor/sensor.h:* Software License Agreement (BSD
License)
./urdf_model_state/include/urdf_model_state/model_state.h:* Software License
Agreement (BSD License)

Besides this, consider taking into account what I wrote in the thread starting
at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2012-October/008714.html

Admitted, as this package doesn't provide any testsuites nor coding examples,
applying this proposal to this package is pretty meaningless and raises doubts
on this package's quality.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to