Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878612

--- Comment #7 from Andrew McNabb <amcn...@mcnabbs.org> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Review based on the current version:
> ab24557ef52c1bc6ff79f81408d9357888dfa55a4d90657576822c24c36f077e 
> pexpect-u-2.5.1.tar.gz
> 
> Cosmetic:
> * Can change python-devel to python2-devel

Done.

> * No need for -O1 in the build and install lines (brp-python-bytecompile
> will (re)do that)

Done.

> Needswork:
> * Change source
> http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pexpect-u/pexpect-u-[..]
>   to Source0:
> http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pexpect-u/pexpect-u-[..]
>   for consistency with other packages and so that spectool -g works  (notice
> the
>   correction of missing ":" after source)

Done.

> * %if (0%{?fedora} > 15 || 0%{?rhel} > 5) => should remove the || 0%{?rhel}
> > 5 portion because
>   rhel6 doesn't have python3 and we've been told that we're not sure what the
>   story for rhel7 is going to be.

Done.

> * Tests are shipped with the package.  They should be run.  This can be done
> by
>   BuildRequiring python-nose (python3-nose for the pythn3 subbpackage) and
>   running nosetests (nosetests-3.2 for the python3 subpackage)

Done.

> * Description section in the python3 subpackage should say this is for
> python3.
>   Easiest way is just to tack on a one sentence paragraph that says:
>   "This package contains the python3 version of this module"

Done.

> * The comment in the %install section about doing the python3 install first
> is
>   misleading -- there aren't any scripts in %{_bindir} to worry about. 
> Unless
>   there is a reason that order matters here my suggestion is simply to remove
>   the comment.

Done.

(In reply to comment #6)
> So the Obsoletes should be:
>
> Obsoletes: pexpect <= 2.3-9

Done.

The new source RPM is at:
http://aml.cs.byu.edu/~amcnabb/python-pexpect-2.5.1-3.fc17.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to