Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846540

Mattias Ellert <mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se> ---
Fedora review 2012-11-23 sisu-maven-plugin

rpmlint output:

$ rpmlint koji/sisu-maven-plugin-*.rpm
sisu-maven-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mojos -> moos
sisu-maven-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mojos -> moos
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

+ Rpmlint OK
+ Package named according to the guidelines
+ Specfile named after the package
+ The package license tag "ASL 2.0 and EPL" is an approved Fedora license
+ The package license tag matches the license in the sources
+ License files included in %doc (LICENSE-ASL.txt and LICENSE-EPL.txt)
+ The spcefile is written in legible English
+ Sources matches upstream:

sha256sum sisu-maven-plugin-1.1 sisu-maven-plugin-1.1.tar.gz 
954de8ca41fefd09e3ee01549f532b6bd7e04d56b3176ecb2ae197ce28debe62 
sisu-maven-plugin-1.1
954de8ca41fefd09e3ee01549f532b6bd7e04d56b3176ecb2ae197ce28debe62 
sisu-maven-plugin-1.1.tar.gz

+ Package builds in koji

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4720986

+ BuildRequires are sane
+ No locales
+ No shared libraries
+ No bundled libraries
+ Package own directories it creates
+ No duplicates in %files (except for license files)
+ File permissions are sane
+ Specfile uses macros consistently
+ Contains code
+ Javadoc in separate sub package
+ %doc is not runtime essential
+ No static libraries
+ No development files
+ No libtool archives
+ No GUI applications
+ Package does not own other's directories
+ Installed filenames are valid utf8

Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to