Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018

--- Comment #50 from Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> ---
Originally I was considering arguing for allowing Node.js to take over the
/usr/bin/node name, since it has a much higher user base than the amateur radio
package. However, after looking into other distribution packages, it's become
clear that they have all standardized on the 'nodejs' rename. So to remain
consistent, I've patched the RPM build to generate output as 'nodejs' instead.

I've also corrected the dependency requirement on http-parser, which needs to
be 2.0+.

Spec: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/nodejs/nodejs.spec
SRPM:
http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/nodejs/nodejs-0.9.3-4.fc18.src.rpm

Built in Koji for Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4737762



T.C., thank you for the information about the NPM stuff. I'm also wondering if
you would be interested in being a comaintainer on the nodejs package. You seem
to have a lot of knowledge on the subject.

Right now my work on the npm packaging is stalled because we need to have the
license evaluated. NPM uses a modified MIT license and it's not on the list of
acceptable licenses for Fedora. (Nor is it on the unacceptable list) so I'm
having the lawyers take a look at it. I'll let you know what they decide on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to